When asked by a reporter about his recent decision to withhold military assistance to Ukraine, President Trump quickly changed his story. In January, he said he withheld the assistance because of his concerns about corruption in Zelensky’s new government. But he changed his story again on Tuesday, saying that he had held off on military support for Ukraine out of frustration with European nations for not doing more to help the region.
Then, on Monday, he retracted the tweet and pointedly said that he was “disappointed” by the tweet. The tweet was a cynic attack against the president, but he cited the letter he’d received from Marie Yovanovitch, the head of the U.S. embassy in Kiev. That’s a clear rebuke of the envoy’s role in bolstering the Ukrainian government and its leaders. But the real reason why the president has taken such action is a different story entirely.
The ‘transcript’ that was released by Trump rewrites the events of the Ukraine crisis and demonstrates that the president did not do everything he said in the press conference. However, the ‘transcript’ is a misleading one, according to two journalists from the New York Times and Vox. Both reporters pointed out that the “truth” about the ‘transcript’ is untrue.
The ‘transcript’ Trump’s team produced for the ‘Ukraine’ report is also false. He said that his allies pressed Ukraine to investigate their political opponents. Giuliani and the AP report, which cites a report by Andrew Kramer and Zack Beauchamp, denied that the president asked their envoy to pressure the Ukrainian government to sell gas.
The whistle-blower’s complaint alleges that Trump, Goldman, and Haberman conspired to ‘rewrite’ the truth about the sanctions on Ukraine. Those who were accused of colluding with Russia are under investigation. The investigation into Biden’s actions led to a ‘pro-Russian’ policy. ‘The Russia-Ukraine scandal’ is not the only ‘rewrite’ of the President’s role in bolstering Ukraine.
As the Ukrainian government continues to defy international law, Trump has sought to rewrite his role in bolstering the nation’s military. This includes the removal of the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine and his decision to bolster Ukrainian forces. Nevertheless, his actions are not entirely unambiguous. The president’s statements on this matter are “unacceptable” and should not be believed.
The former president sought to rewrite his role in Europe’s security by bolstering Ukraine’s military with weapons. He even threatened to suspend NATO if the country refused to give him his weapons. The decision has been deemed illegal by some governments and was at the center of Trump’s first impeachment trial. In addition to these, he has repeatedly threatened to pull the arms of the Ukrainian government.