The UK government’s top legal adviser has raised concerns about the legality of Israel’s actions in Iran. This information comes from a source who spoke to Sky News, suggesting that Attorney General Richard Hermer’s views could complicate the UK’s potential involvement in the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict.
If the Attorney General finds Israel’s actions to be unlawful, it would limit the UK’s ability to support Israel or assist the United States in any military actions against Iran. The source indicated that the UK could only engage if its personnel were directly threatened.
Currently, US President Donald Trump is weighing military options regarding Iran, hinting at possible American involvement. This situation has raised questions about the UK’s role, especially since US B-2 bombers might be used to target Iran’s nuclear facilities, which are located deep within mountains.
The UK has previously allowed the US to use its military bases for operations, including the base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, which is strategically close to Iran. However, if the UK denies support, it could complicate US military plans and strain diplomatic relations.
Israel justifies its military actions by claiming that Iran poses an immediate threat. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has pointed to intelligence suggesting Iran is close to obtaining nuclear weapons and is planning attacks on Israel. However, the Israeli government has not publicly provided evidence for these claims.
The Attorney General’s office has stated that it does not routinely disclose legal advice, but the concerns about Israel’s actions have raised significant legal questions. The UK military has previously defended Israel against Iranian attacks, but it has not yet participated in the current conflict, which began with Israel’s strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
International law complicates the situation further. Different countries interpret the law regarding preemptive strikes in various ways. Some believe nations can act against imminent threats, while others argue that action should only follow an actual attack. The key legal question is whether Iran’s threat is truly imminent.
As this situation develops, the UK government’s stance will be closely watched, as it could significantly impact international relations and military strategies in the region.