Many supporters of the MAGA movement are calling for President Donald Trump to adopt an America First foreign policy. However, there is a significant challenge: the movement has yet to define what this policy should look like across different global conflicts. Leaders and followers within the movement often have differing opinions on how to approach foreign affairs.
Currently, the America First approach is largely reactive. The movement is united in its opposition to what they see as excessive interventions in foreign conflicts, particularly the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Many in the movement share a common narrative: America suffered greatly in those conflicts, with little to show for the sacrifices made. The Taliban remains in control of Afghanistan, and Iraq has become more aligned with Iran, which is far from the intended outcomes of U.S. involvement.
To move forward, supporters argue that America First needs to shift from merely reacting to past mistakes to creating a clear policy framework. This will require careful thought and discussion. Before diving into specific policies, there needs to be agreement on fundamental principles that will guide U.S. foreign policy.
One key principle is that American interests should be the sole focus of foreign policy decisions. Advocates argue that past justifications for military action, such as promoting democracy or protecting international norms, should not be the primary considerations. Instead, any military engagement must be justifiable to the families of soldiers who may lose their lives in service.
Another important point is that the U.S. cannot simply ignore global affairs. While historical figures like Washington and Jefferson warned against entangling alliances, they also recognized the need to confront foreign threats. The founders took action when necessary, such as during the Quasi-War with France and the Barbary Wars, showing that awareness of global issues is crucial.
Additionally, there is a recognition that America has limits in its ability to project power. The resources available for military action are not limitless. The financial burden of past wars has contributed to a national debt that now overshadows defense spending. This reality calls for prioritization in how the U.S. engages with the world.
Finally, the concept of alliances must be reevaluated. The idea is to find true partners who are willing to share the burden of defense. Allies should be expected to contribute significantly rather than relying solely on U.S. military support. This shift in thinking could lead to more balanced international relationships, where allies step up to defend shared interests.
As the America First movement seeks to define its foreign policy, these principles aim to guide its direction. The movement is currently moving away from past excesses of interventionism, but it must be careful not to swing too far in the opposite direction. A thoughtful approach is necessary to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.