Governor Gavin Newsom recently stirred controversy by comparing the state of the United States under former President Donald Trump to a “five-alarm fire.” This statement was made during an interview with ABC News anchor Jonathan Karl, where Newsom expressed deep concerns about the future of democracy in the country.
In his remarks, Newsom emphasized his fears about Trump’s potential to undermine elections and the democratic process. He stated, “I really am scared to death about what’s going on in this country. I really believe it is Code Red. It’s five-alarm fire.” He urged people to take action, warning that without intervention, the nation could lose its ability to hold fair elections.
However, Newsom’s choice of words quickly drew criticism, especially given California’s recent experiences with devastating wildfires. Critics pointed out the irony of using a fire metaphor, particularly after the Palisades fire, which destroyed thousands of homes and resulted in loss of life. Actor James Woods was among those who responded sharply, reminding Newsom of the consequences of past fires in California and linking them to his leadership.
California gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton also weighed in, accusing Newsom of attempting to disenfranchise voters and entrench a one-party rule in the state. He dismissed Newsom’s warnings about threats to democracy as hypocritical.
Other commentators echoed this sentiment. Jennifer Van Laar from RedState highlighted the Palisades fire, questioning who was responsible for the management of that crisis. Margot Cleveland raised concerns about Newsom’s own record in handling such emergencies. Doug Powers added to the criticism, suggesting that Newsom’s comments lacked self-awareness given the state’s struggles with wildfires.
The backlash against Newsom’s comments reflects a growing divide in political discourse, especially regarding the perceived threats to democracy and governance in the United States. While Newsom aimed to rally support against Trump, his metaphorical language became a focal point for criticism from various quarters.
