CNN commentator Scott Jennings recently criticized Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan for her changing stance on nationwide injunctions. During a discussion on "CNN Newsnight" with host Abby Phillip, Jennings pointed out that Kagan seemed to shift her views depending on which party was in power.
Jennings made his remarks while reflecting on Kagan’s previous opposition to nationwide injunctions when a Democrat was president. He tweeted, “Does anyone remember Justice Kagan being against nationwide injunctions when we had a DEMOCRAT President? Pepperidge Farms remembers.” This comment sparked conversation about the inconsistency of opinions among justices based on political contexts.
Phillip opened the discussion by noting that both parties have criticized nationwide injunctions, which allow lower courts to issue rulings that affect the entire country. These injunctions have often been a source of frustration for presidents from both parties, especially when used against their policies.
Jennings celebrated a recent court decision that he believes curtails the power of individual judges to block presidential actions. He expressed that it was a significant moment for President Donald Trump, suggesting that the ruling would help him advance his agenda.
He quoted Kagan from 2022, who stated, “It just can’t be right that one District Judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks.” Jennings highlighted the irony that Kagan voted against the recent ruling, implying her views were inconsistent.
He concluded by emphasizing that allowing one district judge to halt national policies is problematic. Jennings believes this ruling is a step toward a more balanced judicial approach, ensuring that elected officials can carry out their duties without being obstructed by individual judges.