Maureen Dowd, a well-known political columnist, has sparked controversy with her latest op-ed titled “Trump is Rootin’ for Putin.” The piece, published on March 1, 2025, in The New York Times, has drawn criticism for its lack of depth and analysis. Critics argue that Dowd relies heavily on snarky comments and pop culture references rather than providing insightful commentary on current events.
In her recent writings, Dowd has focused intensely on Donald Trump, often using him as a target for her sharp, yet sometimes superficial, critiques. Many believe that her approach to political writing has become repetitive, reducing complex issues to simplistic narratives. In her latest article, she presents a binary view of the world: portraying Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as good, Russian President Vladimir Putin as bad, and Trump as a villain who somehow aligns with Putin.
This pattern of writing has been noted over the years. Dowd’s earlier works have also faced scrutiny. For instance, her portrayal of George W. Bush and Barack Obama often strayed into personal anecdotes and light-hearted comparisons, rather than serious political analysis. Critics have pointed out that her writing tends to resemble gossip rather than journalism, often lacking the necessary context and nuance.
In contrast, other political writers, like Peggy Noonan, have been recognized for their ability to engage with serious political issues while maintaining a sense of dignity and depth. Noonan’s writing often reflects a comprehensive understanding of American politics, focusing on the weight of significant moments in history. Many argue that while Dowd’s work may entertain, it lacks the lasting impact and substance that characterizes more respected political commentary.
As Dowd continues to write, her fans and critics alike will watch closely to see if she can evolve her style or if she will remain entrenched in her current approach. The debate over her contributions to political discourse highlights a broader conversation about the role of journalism in shaping public understanding of complex issues.