In a recent commentary, the issue of snobbery in American political and cultural discourse has been brought to the forefront, highlighting the disconnect between elite perspectives and the experiences of ordinary citizens. The piece critiques notable figures such as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, who have been accused of dismissing the concerns of the white working class in the Rust Belt, labeling them with derogatory terms that reflect a broader condescension towards those outside elite circles.
The commentary argues that snobbery manifests as a refusal to engage with or understand the lives of those considered "wrong" by the elite. This is illustrated through historical references, including a character from Charles Dickens’ work, who embodies a self-satisfied ignorance towards those he deems inferior. The author suggests that this attitude has deep roots, exacerbated by rapid technological advancements that have led some to believe that progress in all areas of life should mirror technological change.
The text asserts that true progress in human affairs is often slow and requires a nuanced understanding of historical and moral lessons from previous generations. The commentary criticizes contemporary leaders, particularly within the Roman Catholic Church, for discarding traditional practices in favor of modern ideologies, which the author believes alienates many faithful followers.
The rise of what the author terms "snobs of incompetence" is also discussed. These individuals, often shielded by wealth and social status, produce subpar work while deriding those who challenge their views as unsophisticated. The commentary cites examples from the art world and education, where traditional methods and values have been replaced by what the author sees as misguided trends.
The election of Donald Trump is framed as a reaction against this elite snobbery, suggesting that many voters sought to assert their autonomy and challenge the notion that they are incapable of making informed decisions about their lives. The commentary concludes with a call for greater transparency regarding the actions of those in power, suggesting that understanding the motives and decisions of elite leaders is crucial for a more informed public discourse.
This commentary serves as a reflection on the growing divide between elite perspectives and the realities faced by many Americans, urging a reevaluation of how society engages with its diverse constituents.