Rule of Law Under Obama-Appointed Judges

A recent article by Dov Fischer, a seasoned attorney and law professor, has sparked discussions about the power dynamics within the U.S. judicial system. Fischer, who has over a decade of civil law practice and extensive teaching experience at the University of California Law School, shares his insights on the influence of federal district court judges compared to higher court judges.

Fischer argues that while many believe Supreme Court justices hold the most power, it is actually the district court judges who wield significant authority. He explains that these judges often make decisions without much oversight, and many of their rulings do not get appealed. This lack of appeal is primarily due to the high costs associated with filing an appeal and the perception that losing parties are unlikely to succeed in higher courts.

He shares a personal anecdote about a case involving Samsung, where a district court judge advised him to allow the opposing party a chance to present their case instead of dismissing it outright. This experience highlighted for him how district judges can exercise their discretion in ways that significantly impact the outcomes of cases.

Fischer expresses concern that many district judges, particularly those appointed by Democratic presidents, may use their positions to push political agendas. He points out that when conservative rulings are issued, the media often highlights the judges’ Republican appointments, while similar scrutiny is not applied to judges who issue liberal rulings. He encourages readers to investigate judges’ backgrounds to understand their potential biases.

The article also touches on broader themes of justice and democracy. Fischer argues that the judicial system should uphold the will of the people, particularly in light of executive actions taken by elected officials. He criticizes the notion that a single judge can overrule the decisions made by the electorate, suggesting that this undermines democratic principles.

Fischer’s commentary raises important questions about judicial accountability and the balance of power within the U.S. legal system. As the country moves forward, the role of judges and their influence on political matters will likely continue to be a topic of debate among legal experts and the public alike.