Scientist Reportedly Refused Entry to US Due to Critical Messages About Trump Found on Phone

A French scientist was denied entry into the United States while traveling to a conference near Houston. This incident occurred on March 9, as he underwent a random check at the airport. During this check, authorities searched his work computer and personal phone, where they found messages that led to his expulsion.

The unnamed researcher was reportedly accused of having communications that expressed hatred toward former President Donald Trump. These messages were described as "hateful and conspiratorial." Although the FBI opened an investigation into the matter, no charges were ultimately filed against him.

Philippe Baptiste, France’s research minister, expressed concern over the situation. He stated that the researcher’s phone contained exchanges with colleagues where he shared his views on the Trump administration’s research policies. Baptiste emphasized the importance of freedom of opinion and academic freedom, values he believes should be upheld.

The scientist, who is affiliated with the French National Centre for Scientific Research and specializes in space research, had his equipment confiscated and was sent back to Europe the following day. In response to this incident, Baptiste reached out to American research institutions, inviting researchers to consider working in France. He noted that many prominent researchers are reconsidering their futures in the U.S. due to such incidents.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has been approached for comments regarding this case, but no response has been received yet.

Author

  • The American Drudge Report - Always Telling the Truth

    David Brown doesn’t just follow the news—he chases it down back roads, courthouse steps, and late-night diner booths. Years spent freelancing on shoestring budgets sharpened his instinct for the detail that cracks a story open, and that grit still shows in every piece he files for the American Drudge Report. Whether he’s unpacking a policy twist or spotlighting a forgotten voice, David writes with one question in mind: “Will this matter when the headlines scroll away?” His readers count on him for clear facts, honest angles, and a lingering nudge to keep thinking long after the tab is closed.