A recent memo from the State Department reveals plans under the Trump administration to close several U.S. embassies and consulates around the world. This proposal suggests closing 10 embassies and 17 consulates, with significant cuts in Africa and Europe. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has denied these plans, but the memo indicates a potential shift in U.S. diplomatic presence.
The draft memo outlines that six of the proposed embassy closures would be in Africa, targeting countries like the Central African Republic, Eritrea, and South Sudan. In Europe, it suggests closing small embassies in Luxembourg and Malta, as well as missions in Grenada and the Maldives. The embassy in Mogadishu, Somalia, may also face downsizing.
Most of the consulates recommended for closure are located in Europe. The memo lists five consulates in France, specifically in Bordeaux, Lyon, Marseilles, Rennes, and Strasbourg. It also mentions closures in Germany, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and several other locations, including Greece, Italy, and South Africa.
The memo also proposes closing the Baghdad Diplomatic Support Center in Iraq and consolidating consular functions in countries like Japan and Canada, where multiple consulates exist.
While the memo suggests significant changes, some officials believe these moves may not actually reduce the U.S. presence abroad. Critics argue that many of the targeted posts are already small and underutilized. They suggest that closing these embassies may not significantly impact U.S. interests, especially in the context of countering Chinese influence in Africa.
Some American officials have expressed skepticism about the perceived threat from China, questioning the necessity of maintaining a strong diplomatic presence in certain regions. They argue that many of these embassies were established during the Cold War and may no longer serve a vital purpose.
The memo’s proposals have sparked debate about the future of U.S. diplomacy. As the State Department considers these changes, the implications for American foreign policy and international relations remain uncertain. The discussions highlight a broader reevaluation of how the U.S. engages with the world and the effectiveness of its diplomatic efforts.