A growing concern among many citizens is the impact of U.S. foreign policy on global conflicts, particularly in Ukraine and Gaza. These situations have sparked outrage and shame, especially among younger generations who witness the consequences unfold in real time on platforms like TikTok.
In Ukraine, since 2014, U.S. officials have viewed the conflict with Russia as a strategic game. Many believe that the U.S. has used Ukraine as a pawn in a larger geopolitical struggle. Reports suggest that American agencies have influenced Ukraine’s institutions, pushing policies that some Ukrainians find troubling, such as funding for controversial social programs. The aid provided by the U.S. has not aimed to decisively defeat Russian forces but rather to weaken them, resulting in significant human suffering. Casualty estimates for the war have reached close to 1 million, with thousands of civilian deaths reported.
On the other side, the situation in Gaza is equally dire. Since the conflict escalated after October 7, the Gaza Health Ministry reports that over 50,000 Palestinians have died due to Israeli attacks. The humanitarian crisis is exacerbated by a blockade that has led to widespread starvation and destruction of essential services. Children make up a significant portion of the casualties, and organizations like UNICEF have labeled Gaza as "the most dangerous place in the world to be a child."
The conflict has also led to internal strife within Gaza. Many citizens are protesting against Hamas, the governing body, which has not held elections in nearly two decades. In response to dissent, Hamas has reportedly been cracking down on political opposition.
Critics argue that both the Israeli and Russian governments are using security as a justification for their aggressive actions. In Israel, some officials have openly discussed their intentions to alter Gaza’s demographics, raising alarms about potential ethnic cleansing. This mirrors concerns in Ukraine, where narratives around national security are used to justify military actions.
Former President Donald Trump has expressed mixed views on these conflicts. While he has called for a ceasefire in Gaza, he has also faced criticism for his administration’s approach to foreign policy, which some see as favoring military engagement over diplomatic solutions. Observers suggest that renewing a ceasefire could help alleviate civilian suffering, but it may also provoke backlash from those in the U.S. who support aggressive policies.
As these conflicts continue, many Americans are reflecting on the legacy of U.S. involvement abroad. There is a growing call for a more compassionate approach that prioritizes human life and seeks to understand the complexities of these wars, rather than simply pursuing strategic interests. The hope is to avoid a future filled with regret over decisions made today.