"‘Who Do You Believe Manufactures Teslas?’: CNN Panel erupts Over Trump’s Tesla Ride at the White House"

A recent CNN discussion turned lively as panelists debated President Donald Trump’s decision to take a Tesla for a spin at the White House alongside Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla. The conversation highlighted differing perspectives on the implications of this high-profile endorsement.

Democratic strategist Xochitl Hinojosa opened the debate by questioning the wisdom of Trump’s public support for a billionaire’s company, especially while Musk was involved with the Department Of Government Efficiency (DOGE). She suggested that a savvy Republican strategist would have advised against such a move.

However, Republican commentator Scott Jennings disagreed. He expressed surprise at Hinojosa’s stance, arguing that supporting American companies like Tesla, which employs thousands of workers, is beneficial. Jennings emphasized that if he were advising a Republican president, he would encourage backing American businesses.

The discussion heated up as Hinojosa challenged Jennings, asking if he was really okay with supporting a billionaire while ignoring the American workforce. Jennings countered by pointing out that Tesla’s production relies on a large number of American workers, not just Musk himself. He highlighted the extensive network of factories Tesla operates across the U.S.

Hinojosa then shifted the focus to optics, claiming that Trump driving a luxury vehicle was out of touch with everyday Americans. Jennings responded by referencing President Joe Biden, questioning whether it was inappropriate for Biden to drive a Jeep Rubicon, which is also a high-priced vehicle.

Hinojosa maintained that the real issue was Trump’s connection with a billionaire who has influence over government business decisions. She argued that this relationship creates a poor image for Trump. Jennings, in turn, expressed frustration at what he saw as a trend among Democrats to criticize American companies, stating it was unusual to see such negative sentiment directed at a successful business.

The lively exchange underscored the stark divisions in how both sides view the intersection of politics and business, particularly in relation to American jobs and the image of political leaders.