California Governor Gavin Newsom has set an ambitious goal for the state: by 2035, all in-state sales of new passenger cars and trucks must be zero-emission vehicles. This directive comes from his executive order N-79-20, issued on September 23, 2020. The move aims to combat climate change and promote cleaner air, but it has sparked significant debate.
Recently, former President Donald Trump rolled back California’s electric vehicle (EV) regulations, arguing that they limit consumer choice and hinder economic growth. In response, Newsom strongly criticized Trump’s actions, claiming they threaten California’s clean air policies and the state’s competitive edge globally. He announced plans to sue the Trump administration over this decision.
Critics of Newsom’s plan point out that electric vehicles are not entirely "zero-emission." The production of EV batteries requires substantial energy, and mining for materials can be damaging to the environment. Additionally, the disposal of these batteries raises further environmental concerns. They argue that Newsom’s focus on an EV-only future overlooks these critical trade-offs.
California’s electric grid is already under strain. In 2022, the state advised EV owners to avoid charging their vehicles during peak hours, which are often the most convenient times for commuters. While California boasts over 178,000 public EV chargers, it has only one nuclear power plant, raising questions about the state’s ability to support a growing number of electric vehicles.
In contrast, France operates 18 commercial nuclear power plants, making it the world’s largest net exporter of electricity. This difference highlights the challenges California faces in transitioning to an all-electric vehicle future while ensuring reliable energy sources.
Newsom’s plan is rooted in concerns about climate change, but some believe he fails to acknowledge differing scientific opinions on the issue. After severe wildfires in 2020, he attributed the worsening conditions to climate change, stating, “the hots are getting hotter, the dries are getting drier.” Critics argue that such views serve a political agenda rather than a balanced understanding of the issues.
Beyond the EV mandate, Newsom has signed legislation requiring stores to have gender-neutral children’s sections, and he has supported measures that limit the independence of gig workers. Many Californians feel these policies restrict personal choice and have led to a significant exodus of residents seeking more freedom elsewhere.
As California pushes forward with its ambitious EV goals, the debate over environmental policies, consumer choice, and energy sustainability continues to unfold. The outcome may influence not just the state but potentially set precedents for other regions across the country.