Dodgers Suffer Unusual Run from Controversial Call as Ball Bounces Off Shin in Loss to Mets

In a surprising turn of events during Saturday’s game, the New York Mets faced a controversial call that allowed the Los Angeles Dodgers to score a run, raising questions about umpiring decisions in Major League Baseball. The incident occurred in the second inning when a ball hit by Dodgers catcher Dalton Rushing appeared to strike him in the shin before rolling into play.

As the play unfolded, Mets catcher Luis Torrens quickly retrieved the ball and threw it to first base, resulting in the second out of the inning. Meanwhile, Dodgers player Tommy Edman crossed home plate, giving his team a 2-0 lead. However, replays clearly showed that the ball had indeed hit Rushing’s shin, which should have been ruled a foul ball.

This missed call left both teams and fans puzzled. It seemed that even the Mets thought the ball was dead, as Torrens and pitcher David Peterson paused when the ball was hit. Unfortunately for the Mets, the play was not reviewable under MLB rules, which meant they could not challenge the decision. This oversight allowed the Dodgers to capitalize on the situation.

The Mets managed to bounce back in the game, scoring five unanswered runs to secure a 5-2 victory over the Dodgers. This win was crucial for the Mets, especially after a tough loss the previous day, where they also faced a confusing call regarding a sacrifice fly.

The incident has sparked discussions about the need for clearer guidelines on reviewable plays and how umpires can better communicate their decisions during games. Fans and analysts alike are calling for improvements to ensure that such critical moments do not overshadow the excitement of the game.

Author

  • The American Drudge Report - Always Telling the Truth

    Jackson Harrison has spent the last fifteen years with a notebook in one hand, a phone on record, and just enough caffeine to outpace the news cycle. He cut his teeth covering city-council brawls and election-night chaos, learning early that facts only matter if readers can see themselves in the story. Trained in political science and fluent in digital media, Jackson translates policy jargon into plain English and backs every line with verifiable details—no shortcuts, no spin. His pieces for independent outlets have sparked podcast debates, landed in national roundups, and earned nods from voices on every side of the aisle. Whether he’s tracing a social trend or untangling Capitol Hill maneuvering, Jackson writes so that everyday readers walk away informed, not overwhelmed—and maybe ready to ask a better question next time the headlines roll in.