The government is often seen as a poorly run business, and many believe it needs to be downsized to limit its negative impact. This view is part of a broader discussion about the effectiveness of democracy and governance. Critics argue that if corporate decisions were made as democratically as political decisions, many businesses would fail. H. L. Mencken famously noted that democracy relies on the collective wisdom of people who may not be well-informed.
Using a culinary metaphor, the article suggests that governing a large nation should be approached with care, much like cooking a delicate dish. The author points to various historical figures, like Lenin and Barack Obama, who have used their leadership to create division rather than unity. In contrast, Ronald Reagan is highlighted for understanding that the government’s role is to protect people from each other, rather than from themselves.
The author proposes a conservative plan aimed at improving the future for younger generations. This plan involves cutting back on federal spending, reducing bureaucracy, and addressing issues in education, immigration, and energy policy. However, implementing these changes may lead to short-term pain, as voters often expect immediate results from their leaders.
The article emphasizes the need for politicians to communicate honestly with citizens about the challenges ahead. It cites Javier Milei, the new leader of Argentina, who candidly acknowledged the country’s financial struggles and presented a plan for recovery. The author believes that the U.S. and other Western nations must seize the opportunity to build a better future, even if it requires difficult conversations and sacrifices in the present.