In a bold move, Vice President JD Vance spoke out shortly after the United States launched a significant strike on Iran, targeting its nuclear facilities. During an interview with Kristen Welker on “Meet the Press,” Vance emphasized the U.S. stance of wanting peace, but insisted that this peace hinges on Iran not having nuclear weapons.
Vance explained that the recent military action was aimed at ensuring Iran could not continue its nuclear weapons program. He stated, “What we said to the Iranians is that we do not want war with Iran. We actually want peace, but we want peace in the context of them not having a nuclear weapons program — and that’s exactly what the President accomplished last night.”
Despite the military strike, Vance insisted that the U.S. administration had not abandoned hopes for diplomacy. He argued that the Iranians had stalled negotiations, which led to the decision to take military action. Vance noted that initial hopes existed for a diplomatic solution, but it became clear that Iran was not genuinely engaging in talks. He remarked, “They were trying to draw this process out as long as possible so that they could rebuild their nuclear weapons program without the threat of American action.”
Vance also addressed concerns that the strike might have ended any future diplomatic efforts. He countered these claims by stating that it was Iran’s lack of seriousness in negotiations that ultimately led to the U.S. response. “The diplomacy never was given a real chance by the Iranians,” he said.
As the situation develops, Vance pointed out two key questions that remain: whether Iran would retaliate against U.S. troops and whether it would continue to pursue its nuclear ambitions. He concluded with a pointed remark about Iran’s military capabilities, suggesting they should consider a more peaceful approach.
The Vice President’s comments come at a time of heightened tensions between the U.S. and Iran, following the recent military action aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear potential. As the world watches closely, the implications of this strike could shape future relations in the region.