National Review, a prominent conservative publication, is facing criticism for its recent stance on foreign policy, particularly regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Critics argue that the magazine has aligned itself with the so-called "war party," a coalition of neoconservatives and Democrats who advocate for a more aggressive military approach.
This shift is reminiscent of the magazine’s past, when influential figures like James Burnham and William F. Buckley Jr. expressed skepticism about military interventions. They were known for their realist approach to foreign policy, often recognizing when a military engagement was unwinnable. The current writers at National Review, including Andrew McCarthy and Noah Rothman, seem to have adopted a different perspective, supporting continued U.S. involvement in the Ukraine conflict against Russia.
The article points out that many of these writers have criticized former President Donald Trump for his calls for a negotiated settlement in Ukraine. They argue that Trump’s approach undermines U.S. credibility and aligns with a narrative that portrays Putin as an aggressor akin to Hitler. This rhetoric echoes past conflicts, where the U.S. was urged to intervene based on moral grounds rather than clear national interests.
Trump, on the other hand, advocates for a pragmatic approach, suggesting that the U.S. should prioritize its interests and work towards peace, even if it means making difficult concessions. He believes that maintaining a dialogue with Russia is essential, especially in light of the growing threat from China.
The article highlights the emotional appeal used by the war party, framing the conflict in stark terms of good versus evil. Critics argue that this oversimplification fails to address the complexities of international relations and the interests at stake. They contend that a more reasoned approach is necessary, one that considers the realities on the ground in Ukraine and the broader geopolitical landscape.
As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how National Review’s evolving position will influence conservative thought and policy in the United States. The discourse surrounding U.S. involvement in Ukraine is likely to intensify as the conflict persists and new developments arise.