July 14 marks "International Non-Binary People’s Day," a date established in 2012 to recognize non-binary individuals. However, the observance has sparked debate, particularly among medical professionals. Dr. Hector Chapa, a board-certified OB/GYN, has voiced strong concerns about the implications of this day and the broader trend of using gender-neutral language in medicine and society.
Dr. Chapa argues that human beings are biologically male or female, with exceptions being rare genetic conditions. He believes that prioritizing feelings about gender over biological facts undermines the reality of womanhood. He worries that this shift encourages young girls who may not conform to traditional gender norms to identify as non-binary or male, which he sees as erasing the identity of women.
As a specialist in women’s health, Dr. Chapa emphasizes the importance of using clear language that acknowledges biological differences. He criticizes terms like "pregnant people" and "birthing people," suggesting they dilute the significance of being a woman. He argues that avoiding the term "woman" in discussions about reproductive health does not promote inclusion but rather erases the experiences of women.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Society of Reproductive Medicine have both suggested moving away from gendered language. However, Dr. Chapa believes that this trend is harmful and creates confusion, especially for those with lower health literacy. He cites a recent peer-reviewed paper that warns against the use of "desexed" language, stating it can alienate those it aims to help.
Moreover, he highlights the importance of addressing specific health issues that disproportionately affect women, such as maternal mortality rates. By using vague language, he argues, critical social and biological realities are obscured, which could hinder advocacy efforts for women’s health.
Dr. Chapa also points out that prominent figures, like author J.K. Rowling, have faced backlash for opposing gender-neutral terms. He notes that even the U.S. government has recently reaffirmed the biological definitions of men and women, stating a commitment to clear language regarding gender.
In his home state of Texas, legislation has been passed that defines man and woman based on biological reality. Dr. Chapa sees this as a positive step for women’s rights and health advocacy.
As discussions about gender continue to evolve, Dr. Chapa calls for a return to using the word "woman" to ensure that the voices and needs of women are not lost in the conversation. He believes that clarity in language is essential for justice and advocacy, particularly for those who have fought hard for recognition and rights.
In a world where inclusion is often a priority, Dr. Chapa urges society not to forget the importance of defining and uplifting womanhood. He believes that avoiding the term does not foster equality but instead creates silence around women’s issues.