Democratic Representative Jared Golden from Maine has made headlines for changing his stance on voter ID laws. Recently, he sided with Republicans to support a bill called the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. This act aims to enhance election security by requiring voters to provide identification when registering to vote in federal elections.
However, this shift is notable because Golden previously voted against similar voter ID measures during his time in the Maine legislature. In 2015, he voted to reject a bill that would have mandated photo identification for voters. Again, in 2017, he opposed another voter ID proposal that required proof of identity.
Golden’s recent support for the SAVE Act, which he has backed multiple times, marks a significant change. In a post on his Substack, he defended his decision, arguing that ensuring elections are only for citizens is a widely supported idea. He criticized his fellow Democrats for what he described as fearmongering over the issue, claiming that 83% of Americans back voter ID laws.
This shift in Golden’s position may be influenced by the political landscape in his district. He narrowly won re-election last year by less than one percentage point against Republican Austin Therialt. Golden represents Maine’s 2nd Congressional District, which has leaned Republican in recent elections, voting for Donald Trump in both 2020 and 2024. Recent polls suggest that Golden’s approval ratings have declined, prompting speculation about his political future.
Critics have labeled Golden a political opportunist, suggesting that his change in stance is a desperate attempt to regain favor with voters and raise campaign funds. Maureen O’Toole, a spokesperson for the National Republican Congressional Committee, accused him of flip-flopping on issues to gain attention.
Golden’s office has not responded to requests for comments on this matter. As he navigates these political waters, his future in Congress may depend on how well he can balance the expectations of his constituents with the pressures of party politics.