Trump Labels Mamdani a Radical Communist, Vows to Withhold Federal Funds from NYC if Elected Mayor

President Trump recently criticized New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, labeling him a “pure communist.” Trump expressed his concerns during an interview on Fox News, stating that Mamdani’s victory in the upcoming general election could jeopardize federal funding for the city.

“I think it’s very bad for New York,” Trump said, emphasizing his disapproval of Mamdani’s democratic socialist platform. He made it clear that if Mamdani were to win, he would have to cooperate with the federal government to secure financial support for the city. “If he does get in, I’m going to be president, and he is going to have to do the right thing, or they’re not getting any money,” Trump warned.

Mamdani recently won the Democratic primary, defeating former Governor Andrew Cuomo by a significant margin. His campaign focuses on addressing issues like housing and social equity, which resonate with many voters in the city.

Trump’s remarks reflect the ongoing tensions between federal and local governments, especially as cities grapple with funding and governance challenges. The stakes are high as New York City approaches the general election, and Mamdani’s policies will likely continue to be a focal point of debate.

Author

  • The American Drudge Report - Always Telling the Truth

    Jackson Harrison has spent the last fifteen years with a notebook in one hand, a phone on record, and just enough caffeine to outpace the news cycle. He cut his teeth covering city-council brawls and election-night chaos, learning early that facts only matter if readers can see themselves in the story. Trained in political science and fluent in digital media, Jackson translates policy jargon into plain English and backs every line with verifiable details—no shortcuts, no spin. His pieces for independent outlets have sparked podcast debates, landed in national roundups, and earned nods from voices on every side of the aisle. Whether he’s tracing a social trend or untangling Capitol Hill maneuvering, Jackson writes so that everyday readers walk away informed, not overwhelmed—and maybe ready to ask a better question next time the headlines roll in.